![]() (Marvel farms out the planning of its action scenes to second unitĬrews and special effects artists long before the actors arrive on set, which "coverage" by multiple cameras, as opposed to true direction with purposeĪnd flair. Shouldn’t go into it expecting a smooth ride, and you should know that thereĪre basic ways in which it's not up to snuff. Than monotonous quarterly displays of things crashing into other things, with splashes of personality designed to fool people into thinking they're not just widgets stamped out in Marvel's hit factory. And in its growing pains you can see a future in which theseĬorporate movies might indeed be art, or at least unique expressions, rather Personality-specifically Whedon’s-than any other film in the now seven-year-old franchise. Picture, meant to merge strands from solo superhero movies within the Marvel The first "Avengers”-which, like this new installment, was a crescendo This film about a team of good guys battling a brilliant, genocidal robot is bigger, louder and more disjointed than Writer-director Joss Whedon's refrigerator, pantry and spice rack, and dozens ofĮggs are broken in its creation. The second “Avengers” is a gigantic omelet combining everything in It's nice when a movie hands you a metaphor like that. No need to break anything.” “Clearly you’ve never made an omelet,” Ultron ( Chris Hemsworth) tells the android villain Ultron ( James Spader) that “there’s One point in "Avengers: Age of Ultron," the hammer-swinging superhero Thor ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |